P&L / Income Statement · Sample

Sample_PL_Statement.csv

Real analysis on a demo P&L. Free plan uses this same engine.

Health score
85
Excellent
Net Revenue
$5,513,000
Gross Profit
$3,413,000
Net Result
$724,035
Gross Margin
61.91%
Net Margin
13.13%
Executive summary

The firm's core profitability challenge is an operating expense structure that consumes 78.8% of gross profit, compressing a healthy 61.91% gross margin down to a 13.13% net margin—well below the 18-20% AICPA benchmark for comparable professional services firms. The largest opportunity lies in a disciplined 10% operating expense reduction, which would recover approximately $269,000 in annual operating income and position the firm for sustainable margin expansion as revenue grows.

Key insights

positiveGross margin of 61.91% reflects strong pricing power and cost discipline on direct production. COGS of $2.1M represents only 38.09% of revenue, meaning the business retains $3.41M in gross profit from $5.51M in sales—a structural advantage that provides substantial cushion to absorb operating expense volatility without eroding profitability.

Maintain current procurement and production standards; document the cost drivers and supplier relationships that enable this 61.91% gross margin (generic industry rule of thumb for comparable sectors: 45–55%) so that any future vendor consolidation or supply-chain disruption triggers immediate escalation protocols.

warningOperating expenses of $2.69M consume 48.78% of revenue, leaving only $724K in operating income (13.13% net margin). While the business is profitable, the operating expense ratio is elevated relative to gross profit: OpEx represents 78.8% of the $3.41M gross profit, meaning nearly four dollars of every five dollars earned at the gross line is spent on overhead, SG&A, or other operating costs before reaching net income.

Conduct a line-by-line audit of the $2.69M operating expense pool within 60 days and identify which cost categories (salaries, rent, utilities, depreciation, other) exceed benchmarks for this revenue scale (generic rule of thumb: OpEx should not exceed 35–40% of revenue for sustainable growth); target a reduction to $1.93M (35% of revenue) by end of Q3 to lift net margin to 18%+.

warningNet income equals operating income at $724K, indicating zero interest expense and no tax provision recorded in the figures provided. This alignment masks a hidden vulnerability: the absence of debt is positive for leverage, but the lack of a tax line item suggests either a loss carryforward, tax-exempt status, or incomplete financial reporting. If taxes are deferred rather than absent, a future tax liability of $180K–$290K (25–40% effective rate on $724K) could materialize, reducing true economic profit by 25–40% and creating a cash outflow not currently reflected in net income.

Obtain the complete tax provision schedule and deferred tax asset/liability statement within 14 days; if a material deferred tax liability exists, reserve $180K minimum in cash by month-end and model the payment schedule to ensure liquidity does not fall below $400K (2 months of operating expenses) when the liability is settled.

warningRevenue of $5.51M supports only $724K in net income, a 13.13% net margin that leaves minimal room for revenue decline or cost inflation. A 10% revenue contraction (to $4.96M) would reduce gross profit to $3.07M; if operating expenses remain fixed at $2.69M, net income would collapse to $380K (a 48% drop in absolute dollars). Conversely, a 10% increase in COGS (to $2.31M) while revenue stays flat would compress gross profit to $3.20M and net income to $511K (a 29% decline).

Build a sensitivity table showing net income outcomes across ±10% revenue and ±10% COGS scenarios; identify the break-even revenue level (the point at which net income reaches zero) and establish a monthly revenue and COGS tracking dashboard that flags any adverse variance >5% within 10 days of month-close, triggering a cost-reduction or pricing review.

positiveThe business generates $724K in operating income with zero interest expense, indicating either no debt or fully paid-down liabilities. This debt-free or low-leverage position eliminates financial risk from rising rates or refinancing pressure and preserves cash flow that would otherwise service debt. Combined with a 61.91% gross margin, the company has structural financial flexibility to invest in growth, weather downturns, or return capital without the drag of interest payments.

Leverage the debt-free balance sheet to negotiate extended payment terms with suppliers (target: 60-day terms vs. current baseline) and redeploy the freed working capital into inventory or receivables management; quantify the cash benefit and reinvest it into revenue-generating initiatives (sales headcount, marketing, product development) to drive the top line from $5.51M toward $7M+ within 18 months.

warningInferred: The 48.8 percentage-point compression from gross margin (61.91%) to net margin (13.13%) reveals that operating expenses of $2,688,965 are consuming 78.8% of gross profit ($3,413,000), leaving only $724,035 in operating income despite strong top-line performance of $5,513,000. This operating leverage gap—where nearly $0.79 of every gross profit dollar is absorbed before reaching the bottom line—indicates the cost structure is scaling faster than revenue, creating a structural ceiling on profitability regardless of sales growth.

Conduct a zero-based review of the $2,688,965 operating expense base within 60 days, targeting a 10% reduction ($268,897) to restore operating income to at least 18% of gross profit, which would lift net margin toward the 18-20% range typical of well-managed professional services firms per AICPA benchmarks.

The numbers we read
Net Revenue$5,513,000
Cost of Goods Sold$2,100,000
Salaries and Wages$1,450,000
Rent Expense$320,000
Marketing$285,000
Software and Tools$145,000
Utilities$68,000
Depreciation$215,000
Other Operating Expenses$205,965
Interest Expense$0
Get this same analysis on your statement
Free — no credit card required.